<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Toronto Lawyer &#124;  Omar Ha-Redeye, J.D. &#187; Evans v. Teamsters Union No. 31</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.omarha-redeye.com/blog/tag/evans-v-teamsters-union-no-31/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.omarha-redeye.com/blog</link>
	<description>Toronto Lawyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:28:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2009 BLG Labour and Employment Law Moot</title>
		<link>http://www.omarha-redeye.com/blog/2009-blg-labour-and-employment-law-moot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.omarha-redeye.com/blog/2009-blg-labour-and-employment-law-moot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toronto Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLG Labour and Employment Law Moot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borden Ladner Gervais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evans v. Teamsters Union No. 31]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omarha-redeye.com/?p=1490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Omar Ha-Redeye participated in the 2009 Borden Ladner Gervais Labour and Employment Law moot and finished as a finalist, a second-place runner up in the competition. This year&#8217;s competition addressed a hypothetical appeal of the Supreme Court of Canada&#8217;s decision in Evans v. Teamsters Union No. 31, which centered around wrongful dismissal and the duty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omar Ha-Redeye participated in the 2009 <a href="http://www.law.uwo.ca/info-centres-progs/BLGMoot.html">Borden Ladner Gervais Labour and Employment Law</a> moot and finished as a finalist, a second-place runner up in the competition.</p>
<p>This year&#8217;s competition addressed a hypothetical appeal of the Supreme Court of Canada&#8217;s decision in <a href="http://csc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2008/2008scc20/2008scc20.html" target="_blank"><em>Evans v. Teamsters Union No. 31</em></a>, which centered around wrongful dismissal and the duty to mitigate damages by returning to work for an employer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.omarha-redeye.com/blog/2009-blg-labour-and-employment-law-moot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

