Jeremy Barretto of The Court built off a recent post at Slaw on the case of George Galloway.  He explores in greater depth the use of Roncarelli v Duplessis as a basis for the case.

Baretto concludes,

Whatever the case, the following question is inescapable: if Galloway is in fact a threat to our national security why was he allowed to speak freely in the US?

The article on George Galloway was republished on Global Research.

George Galloway is a British MP whose views are controversial, to say the least.

But does that mean that these views should be banned from Canada, especially if he does not promote violence or hatred?

This was the topic of a motion for an interlocutory injunction at the Federal Court today.

Omar Ha-Redeye’s write-up can be found on LawIsCool and Slaw.