<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Toronto Lawyer &#124;  Omar Ha-Redeye, J.D. &#187; Quan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.omarha-redeye.com/blog/tag/quan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.omarha-redeye.com/blog</link>
	<description>Toronto Lawyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:28:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dan Michaluk of Hicks Morley on Information Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.omarha-redeye.com/blog/dan-michaluk-of-hicks-morley-on-information-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.omarha-redeye.com/blog/dan-michaluk-of-hicks-morley-on-information-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toronto Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Michaluk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hicks Morley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proskauer Rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Charney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omarha-redeye.com/?p=815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan Michaluk of Hicks Morley picked up on a post on privacy of unionized employees on Slaw yesterday, and points out a few other resources on the subject, Thank you to the Proskauer Rose privacy law group for their excellent coverage of Quan. For more on this topic, law student and blawgger Omar Ha-Redeye posted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://danmichaluk.wordpress.com/about/" target="_blank">Dan Michaluk </a>of <a href="http://www.hicksmorley.com/index.php?name=News&amp;file=ourpeople&amp;sid=203&amp;catid=2&amp;profile=yes" target="_blank">Hicks Morley</a> <a href="http://danmichaluk.wordpress.com/2009/02/16/information-roundup-15-february-2009/" target="_blank">picked up on a post</a> on privacy of unionized employees on <a href="http://www.slaw.ca/2009/02/15/privacy-expectations-of-unionized-employees-in-the-workplace/" target="_blank">Slaw</a> yesterday, and points out a few other resources on the subject,</p>
<blockquote><p>Thank you to the Proskauer Rose privacy law group for their excellent <a href="http://privacylaw.proskauer.com/2009/01/articles/electronic-communications/rehearing-en-banc-denied-in-quon-with-dissent/" target="_blank">coverage </a>of <em>Quan</em>.  For more on this topic, law student and blawgger Omar Ha-Redeye posted a related <a href="http://www.slaw.ca/2009/02/15/privacy-expectations-of-unionized-employees-in-the-workplace/" target="_blank">piece </a>at Slaw just today and I wrote a <a href="http://www.hicksmorley.com/images/SurveilancePaper_May07_DJM.pdf" target="_blank">paper </a>in 2007 on the the basics of employee surveillance law. These rough ideas to be developed and more to come.</p></blockquote>
<p>The post was based on a talk by <a href="http://www.ogilvyrenault.com/en/people_RichardCharney.htm" target="_blank">Richard Charney </a>from notes on an <a href="http://www.omarha-redeye.com/love-and-marriage-an-employment-law-refresher/" target="_blank">OBA Employment Law conference</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.omarha-redeye.com/blog/dan-michaluk-of-hicks-morley-on-information-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

