Roll Call
(on Left):
(on Right):
(Not in photo but present)
In the March 11, 2011 issue of The Lawyers Weekly, Luigi Benetton interviews Omar Ha-Redeye on his blogging experiences and tips for effective blogging.
 |
Luigi Benetton interviews Omar Ha-Redeye |
 |
|
| RUNNING A legal blog takes commitment | |
(Back, From Left: Andrew Feldstein, Omar Ha-Redeye, Bob Tarantino, Chris Jaglowitz, Lorraine Fleck, Connie Crosby, Syed Ali Ahmed (Front, From Left): Antonin Pribetic, Dan Pinnington, Monica Goyal, Michael Carabash, Garry Wise, Joel Welch, Adam Goodman
Roll call:
A significant number of people have visited this site recently looking for the new Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Bedford v. Canada by Justice Susan G. Himel, relating to the Criminal Code provisions on prostitution.
Sections 210, 212(l)(j), and 213(1)(c) of the Criminal Code were struck down as violating section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms.
At para. 170 of the decision Justice Himel cites the 2006 study by the House of Commons Report of the Subcommittee on Solicitation Laws, The Challenge of Change: A Study of Canada’s Criminal Prostitution Laws, which states,
The vulnerability of persons engaging in street prostitution is also related to the fact that they frequently change locations. As a result of an arrest, fear of arrest, or a court order, [street prostitutes] are often forced to move to another area, effectively separating them from friends, co-workers, regular customers and familiar places. A number of witnesses indicated that this instability jeopardizes prostitutes’ health, safety and well-being.
The case has been uploaded here to assist these members of the public in accessing this information.
Bedford v. Canada, 2010 ONSC 4264
A special thanks to Simon Fodden on Slaw and the University of Toronto’s Sexual Diversity Blog for facilitating this process. See LexisNexis for a case summary, and CanLii for the complete text in html.
Results from the 2009 Canadian Law Blog Awards (CLawBies) are in, and Law is Cool and Slaw are both winners:
1) Best Canadian Law Blog (or Blogger) Award: Slaw – As most readers will already know, Slaw is not only a huge presence on the Canadian law blog scene, but it’s also a testament to the innovative and creative vision of Simon Fodden. It’s often hard to see how Slaw could get better, but it did in 2009. Want proof? See this year’s guest blogging initiatives, which included major law firms, provincial ombudsmen from across Canada, plus five Justices from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Add a DK Blawggies recognition, and we have a winner! Runner ups: Canadian Privacy Law Blog, Wise Law Blog
…
3) Legal Culture Award – Law is Cool – Two of the fastest rising stars in Canadian legal blogging just happen to be law students. Lawrence Gridin and Omar Ha-Redeye lead an impressive group of contributors at Law is Cool, and are seeding the queue with more law student bloggers for the future. Bravo! Culture doesn’t happen without a little sweat equity. Runner ups: Precedent, Dynamic Lawyers Parody Videos
A special thanks to those who gave a special mention to me (although I freely lend my authority to the other sites I’m affiliated with instead):
Antonin Pribetic – My Nominees for the 2009 Canadian Law Blog Awards (the “CLawBies”)
Omar Ha-Redeye Blog: http://www.omarha-redeye.com/): Omar Ha-Redeye is a J.D. candidate at the University of Western Law School and a leading light in the Canadian blawging community. His publications include scientific journals, trade magazines, and contributions to university textbooks. Ha-Redeye has served as a Senior Administrator for a tsunami relief team that operated in rural Aceh, Indonesia and consulted NGO’s and businesses on crisis communications. He has taken the lead in the field of reputation management law. A frequent contributor to Slaw.ca and Law Is Cool, I admire Omar’s dedication to law, justice and human rights.
Donna Seale – My Picks for the 2009 CLawBies
3. My last pick is Slaw. Slaw is a co-operative weblog covering pretty much anything that has a connection to Canadian law and it does that in spades. Since I started following this blog a few years ago it has grown leaps and bounds and now has so many contributors I’ve lost count. In fact, it has grown so much that I sometimes find it hard to keep up with the blog’s multitude of posts, but I always find something in my feedreader from Slaw that is of interest and use to me. I do have to admit, though, that because of the sheer volume of content coming from Slaw I have taken to scouting out posts from particular Slaw contributers — David Bilinsky, Dan Michaluk, Steve Matthews, Jordan Furlong, Omar Ha-Redeye always top my list because they produce content I find personally relevant.
Connie Crosby - My nominations for the Clawbies
Like almost everyone else who have blogged their picks, I can’t help but mention others who are well deserving and should be included in any “top Canadian law blogs list” – Library Boy by Michel-Adrien Sheppard, Law is Cool by an ever-growing slate of law students, created by the inimitable Omar Ha-Redeye, Thoughtful Legal Management by David Bilinsky, Canadian Privacy Law Blog by David Fraser, Michael Geist’s blog which has a reach far, far outside the legal community in Canada, and Halo Secretarial blog by Laurie Mapp who is a legal virtual assistant (or legal VA) and helps me stay on track in my day to day work. And so many others!
Blawger of the Year – Omar Ha-Redeye
My nominations for the 2009 CLawBies Awards.
Despite being conflicted I have to start with Jordan Furlong, especially for posts like this:
Firms focus relentlessly on the students with the highest grades… even though these students can be one-dimensional performers with an affinity for the academic environment and no competing pressures outside the classroom. Contrast that with an older student, perhaps with a couple of kids and a part-time job, with or without a partner at home, who took an unorthodox route to law school and perhaps struggles to compete with the younger students — but who is still bright, hard-working, experienced and capable of being a standout lawyer. The firms never even look at graduates like that, and an opportunity is missed on both sides.
Then there’s always stories like this one which make the choices in a legal career really easy to make,
Nearly half of aboriginal and visible minority lawyers are associates, compared with one-third of white lawyers. And the minority groups are more likely to work as in-house lawyers, in government, in business or as sole practitioners.
As for pay, minority lawyers earned $40,000 less on average than did white lawyers… “This suggests the systemic exclusion of aboriginal and members of visible minorities from the most lucrative jobs.”
Instead, we make our own opportunities like getting involved in social media, becoming what Lawrence Gridin jokes as, “the most famous law student in Canada.” The upside of my approach is that I get people like Dan Michaluk calling me “a fascinating guy.”
That’s not the reason why I’m nominating his site, All About Information, as one of my three, but it sure doesn’t hurt. Instead, it stems out of my increasing interest in Internet and privacy law, despite never taking a single related course at law school, and my focus during articles in litigation.
Which leads me to my second nomination, also mentioned by Dan: Antonin Pribetic of The Trial Warrior. Blogging really is my legal education outside of the classroom, and veterans like Pribetic are a gold mine of information. You can get a better idea of his legal philosophy from a paper that explains the origin of the name of his blog.
Given the issues raised above, I would have to pick Donna Seale‘s Human Rights in the Workplace as my final pick. In fact, Donna caught the above story about discrimination in her last episode of Twitter Talk. Maybe we’ll get change in the Canadian workplace down the road. Maybe we’ll even get change in the Canadian legal workplace too, eventually. I’ll keep ClawBie’ing away along until it does.
I’m obviously conflicted out from Slaw, Law is Cool, and even Wise Law Blog, given the collaborative projects I’ve worked on with Garry.
Jeremy Barretto of The Court built off a recent post at Slaw on the case of George Galloway. He explores in greater depth the use of Roncarelli v Duplessis as a basis for the case.
Baretto concludes,
Whatever the case, the following question is inescapable: if Galloway is in fact a threat to our national security why was he allowed to speak freely in the US?
Law is Cool Slaw Canadian Health Law
