Interview with 106.9FM

September 19, 2008 admin
1 Comment
Conferences, Law School, Media

Omar Ha-Redeye was interviewed today by 106.9FM, a local radio show in London.

Omar spoke about Charter dialogue, the theory that decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada are not final, and are instead referred to the legislature.

Omar Ha-Redeye and Justice Ian Binnie

Omar Ha-Redeye and Justice Ian Binnie

The interview followed a talk by Hon. Justice Ian Binnie of the Supreme Court of Canada, and Hon. John Major, QC, formerly of the Supreme Court, at an event called Courting Democracy.

He also discussed a question he posed regarding access to the Supreme Court by people of socio-economically disadvantaged positions.  Justice Binne agreed that more needs to be done in this regard.

The interview will be aired tonight at approximately 6PM.

Advocacy
Advocacy

2020 Ferris State University Distinguished Alumni Award

Your Legal Rights in the Age of COVID-19

Fire Away – The Employment Law Show | Bill 47 & Doctors’ Notes

RSS Slaw

  • Remembering Attorney General Roy McMurtry April 19, 2024
    The Hon. Roy McMurtry had a stellar career, serving as Chief Justice of Ontario, Canadian High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, Commissioner of the Canadian Football League, and Attorney General of Ontario. When he passed away in March, many of the tributes rightly focussed on the critical role he played in reaching “the kitchen accord” […]
  • Friday Jobs Roundup April 19, 2024
    Each Friday, we share the latest job listings from Slaw Jobs, which features employment opportunities from across the country. Find out more about these positions by following the links below, or learn how you can use Slaw Jobs to gain valuable exposure for your job ads, while supporting the great Canadian legal commentary at Slaw.ca. Current postings […]
  • The Lack of Protection for Non-Denominational Identity: The Webber Academy Case April 18, 2024
    INTRODUCTION Webber Academy (or “the school”), a private educational institution in Alberta, defined itself as non-denominational: it did not engage in any overt religious practice (with one possible and qualified exception). Yet, after two Alberta Human Rights Commission (AHRC) decisions, two Queen’s Bench (as it then was) (QB) judgements, two Court of Appeal (CA) rulings […]
  • Missing Discussions at Center of Union COVID Dispute April 18, 2024
    Written by Daniel Standing, LL.B., Content Editor, First Reference Inc. The Supreme Court of British Columbia rendered a decision (2024 BCSC 55 (CanLII)) on judicial review which looked at the employer’s choice to implement a COVID-19 vaccination policy, and whether, under the Labour Relations Code, it was obligated to enter into discussions with the union […]
  • Thursday Thinkpiece: Internationally-Trained Lawyers Need More Than Just NCA Exams April 18, 2024
    For those of us raised in Canada and who studied law here, it can be easy to forget that the way we practise law is very… Canadian. While we’re all aware that there are substantive differences between Canadian law and the law of other jurisdictions, it’s much easier to forget that the practice of law […]